Truetalk Radio News
Rabbis, Time To Flash Your Badges
 Rabbis, Time To Flash Your Badges - Jewish Apathy Revisited -  - -
"Officer, what's your badge number?"
I've been asked that question countless times over the last 26 years. Almost always, it followed an unpopular decision. Always, it was accompanied by an unspoken message: "I'm letting you know I will hold you accountable for this decision." And always, I answer that question in a direct, simple way: I give my badge number.
In fact, I've shared the right answer to this question with hundreds, if not thousands, of subordinates over the years.
After all, correct decisions may be unpopular, but that doesn't mean they're wrong. So, I've found that my deft response to that question - mandated by NYPD policy - also helps me convey the unspoken message that I welcome scrutiny of my actions. The specter of being held accountable, by anyone, not only doesn't threaten my self-image but it has always been part and parcel of my day-to-day values - an embedded value.
Accountability for one's actions came to mind as I read a flyer full of bluster and threats that was recently circulated in Lakewood, New Jersey, against a hitherto respected rabbi. His crime? He chose to report the sexual abuse of his son to the police.
Let me not digress. It is lamentable that many still pounce on parents who seek to protect their children and our community from dangerous predators, but that is not the focus of this discussion.
Rather, I am particularly irked by the letter writer's request that his reading public "excuse [him] for not signing this letter." After all, he writes, the victim of his polemics may seek to have him prosecuted. Aveira goreres aveira (sin begets more sin), we are told, so readers are asked to understand how necessary and proper his cloak of invisibility is - a selfless act of self-preservation.
Not to me it isn't.
Perusing the flyer, clearly written for haredi readers, one finds numerous comments pertaining to the honor of our Torah, the respect due today's rabbis, the specific legal areas of our Shulchan Aruch allegedly violated, and the awesome desecration of God's name caused by the abuse victim's family. It decries their prosecution of the crime, and threatens additional censure and embarrassment of the family should the prosecution proceed.
Yet, with all the religious "weight" behind him, the letter writer prefers anonymity. Why?
Officer, what's your badge number?
That question, or a permutation of it, should be asked by every individual who held this flyer in his hands. If the muscle of Torah backs this smear campaign, why the incredible lack of accountability? Surely, brilliant Torah minds can devise a micha'ah - formal objection - that makes the point without fear of prosecution.
Wouldn't we all respect a well-constructed argument, coming from some of the stellar minds of the Lakewood yeshiva community? Isn't that what leadership is all about?
Or is it instead about thuggery, threats, and intimidation? Do we dare allow a mob mentality to reign, even when dressed up as a defense of Torah? Let us all recoil in horror when witnessing tactics more appropriately used by underworld figures than Torah scholars.
In a recent e-mail exchange with a shul rabbi I know and respect, I was told that rabbis in leadership positions today "do not usually put their opinions out there, for fear of being overwhelmed with emotional backtalk." I wondered how such individuals could be considered "leaders" at all. Isn't leadership about ownership, about taking responsibility and accepting accountability?
Or is it about this Lakewood gangster, who can only print his diatribes from the shadows? Is this how we want to see Torah defended in an increasingly unsettled world?
If Torah is the ultimate truth - and as Orthodox Jews we believe it is - I hope I am not the only one who has difficulty understanding the lack of accountability that seems to permeate the haredi world today. Lakewood is known as the premier makom Torah in the nation. Why is this odious anonymous circular needed? Aren't there sufficient rabbinical leaders in that city who are certain of their actions and willing to stand up and be accountable for them?
If this father is to be religiously censured for choosing a course of action he felt would best protect his child and community - and to be clear, I believe he is a hero and guiding light to us all - let Lakewood's great rabbinic minds come out and say so openly. That may be an unpopular position outside the Lakewood community, but if Lakewood's rabbis believe it's the right one, then so be it. Let's start seeing leadership and accountability, rather than some cowardly rabble-rouser preaching about chillul Hashem while lacking the courage to be accountable for his words.
I have a badge number, and I'm required to proffer it whenever asked. In 26 years, I've always honored that responsibility, and I cherish the accountability it instills in me.
Rabbinical leaders wear a bigger badge than mine - the badge of Torah. That badge may not have a number, but responsibility and accountability reside within it all the same.
It's time for those who would be leaders to honor that responsibility. And for us in the community to start exercising our right to ask the questions that make the point clearly: Rabbis, your badge makes you accountable, and we'll demand that accountability - each and every day.  Daniel Sosnowik, an Orthodox Jew, is a captain in the New York City Police Department, where he has served since 1984. He is a member of the board of directors of Survivors for Justice (www.sfjny.org), an advocacy organization for victims of abuse.
 
Needed: A Jewish Tea Party
Needed: A Jewish Tea Party  , Rabbi Steven Pruzansky

Needed: A Jewish Tea Party - What happened to Ahavas Yisroel?  -  -

Among the bitterest aspects of the ancient tragedies commemorated during our recent national period of mourning was the crushing disappointment felt by the Jewish people when we were betrayed by our erstwhile allies: "I called for my friends [those who had professed love for me] but they deceived me" (Eicha 1:19).

Rashi comments that this refers to the infamous episode in which the Arabs, our putative cousins, distributed salty foods to the Babylonian exiles on their death march, and then offered flasks that contained nothing but air - and the Jews perished of thirst.

So, on whom can we rely in this world when times are tough for Jews but on each other, on the shared bonds of peoplehood? And therein lies the problem and one of the enigmas of the exile today.

Visiting the Chabad of Salt Lake City, I picked up a few pamphlets Chabad distributes about mitzvot, Shabbat, Jewish life - and one called "Love Your Fellow Jew," a primer on that most indispensable, definitive mitzvah. Its language is both instructive and inspirational:

 

Nothing has been as detrimental to the Jewish people as the modern idea that Judaism is a religion. If we are a religion, then some Jews are more Jewish, others less Jewish and many Jews not Jewish at all. It's a lie. We are all one. If one Jew stumbles, we all stumble with him . We are not a religion. We are a soul. A single soul radiating into many bodies, each ray shining forth on its unique mission, each body receiving the light according to its capacity . A healthy Jewish people is one big, caring family where each individual is concerned for the other as for his own self.

 

Clearly, this is not a universally shared perspective, as the pamphlet continues:

 

Some don't think that Jews should single out Jews for special treatment . We need to get down to reality and human nature: If someone ignores his own brother's needs, what's behind his kindness to others? First we learn to care for our own family, and then we can truly care for everyone else . There's another reason to start with your own fellow Jew: If we do not take care of our own, who will? Perhaps this is the secret of our survival: We are unique, for to this day, when one Jew hears of another's plight somewhere across the globe, he identifies with that Jew, feels his or her pain, and is moved to do whatever he can to help."

 

What beautiful sentiments, and the more I read, the more I wished they were true.

By coincidence, I read this on the same day the Russians extricated their ten spies from the United States by orchestrating an exchange within a week of their arrests, and I wondered to myself - again - what is wrong with the Jewish people? How is it that we sit with such equanimity while Jonathan Pollard now sits in prison for more than 9,000 days, and Gilad Shalit sits for more than four years in some dark abyss, absent without a trace?

Too many Jews say, "Well, Pollard was a spy who committed crimes, so he should sit. And Shalit, well, the government in order to free him has to find the right number of terrorist murderers to free to create more mayhem, so it is really up to us."

And many say, "Well, Sholom Rubashkin deserves 27 years in prison for bank fraud, and the desecration of God's name, and the like. And Israeli MIAs Zachary Baumol, Yehuda Katz and Tzvi Feldman can disappear into Syrian custody, and Ron Arad can evaporate off the face of the earth, and that's just the way it is. And Eli Cohen, the Syrians don't have to return his body for burial even 45 years after his execution, because " I'm not quite sure why.

We have a rationalization for everything, and I'm left to wonder: what is wrong with the Jewish soul? We pay lip service to ahavat Yisrael (love for our fellow Jew), but do we really believe it, or ever act upon it when it is personally inconvenient? The Russians extracted their spies in the blink of an eye; the Chinese community in the 1990s rallied around a Chinese-American spy and he was released after two years; a non-Jewish American naval officer named Michael Schwartz who spied for the Saudis in the 1990s was never even prosecuted, just court-martialed and dismissed.

Somehow, Japanese-Americans kept their unjust internment during World War II in the forefront of American consciousness, and blacks do not let anyone forget the slavery that ended a century and a half ago. Their communities rallied around, and rally around, any victim of perceived injustice. And where are we?

Rubashkin was sentenced to 27 years for defrauding a bank of $27 million dollars - more prison time than the prosecution even requested, and after they initially sought a life sentence. Yet Jeffrey Skilling, former president of Enron - which defrauded banks and investors of billions of dollars, and cost people 20,000 jobs plus their pensions - was sentenced to 24 years, less time than Rubashkin, and Skilling's sentence was just vacated on appeal, and he may be free in a relatively short time.

Bernie Ebbers (WorldCom) was convicted of defrauding investors of $100 billion dollars, and received less prison time than did Rubashkin. Dennis Kozlowski (Tyco) was convicted of stealing five times as much money (and pocketing it) than Rubashkin was accused of - and also received less jail time than Rubashkin. And most recently, Hassan Nemazee, an Iranian-American fundraiser for Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, was sentenced to just 12 years in prison for defrauding banks of $292 million dollars, half the incarceration for more than ten times the fraud.

Granted, no two cases are identical, but the contrasts are still jarring. And one need not argue for the innocence of Pollard or Rubashkin to be outraged at the disproportionate sentences each received. How is this possible? Is there a Jewish surcharge? Do the courts increase a Jew's sentence because of the chillul Hashem involved? Where are we?

Further, why does Israel tolerate the kidnapping of its soldiers, and continue to provide Gilad Shalit's captors - the residents of Gaza who voted Hamas into power - with food and electricity? Has Israel insisted that Shalit be visited by the Red Cross, as is his right under international law, in exchange for those provisions? Has Israel verified that Shalit himself is a beneficiary of that same food and electricity? Jews bend over backward to be more moral - after all, who wants to be accused of collective punishment - but instead we are less moral, lacking even in elementary love for our own flesh and blood, our own people.

 

* * * * *
Whither our ahavat Yisrael? Maybe we don't really care as much as we say we do. Maybe in our drive not to be seen as parochial and overly concerned with only Jewish causes we have robbed ourselves of our natural instinct to help our own. All the hospitals and museums Jewish money provided for the general community have not bought any good will, at least not in the legal system. All the politicians we fund, and whose shoes we run to shine if only they will take a picture with us, surely must mock us behind our backs - because we don't take care of our own. We don't protest, we don't scream. We rely on platitudes and empty promises, and accomplish little for our own people in distress.

On a recent trip to Washington, I visited the Newseum, a fine museum dedicated to the history of journalism. The museum screened a documentary titled "The Media and the Holocaust," describing in great and painful detail the "paltry, embarrassing coverage" (Abe Rosenthal's words) of the Holocaust by the American news media, especially The New York Times.

It is not that the Holocaust wasn't covered - it was. The New York Times alone ran 1,100 Holocaust-related stories during that era - but almost all were buried on the inside pages.

Item one: a tiny story on page 6 in July 1942 reports that "700,000 Jews have been murdered." That same day's newspaper devoted a lengthy page-one article to New York Governor Lehman's decision to donate his tennis shoes to the war effort.

Item two: an April 1943 report on the Warsaw Ghetto uprising - a cover story - failed to mention that the insurgents were Jews; they were described only as Poles.

Item three: The Times reported in July 1943 on the death of "350,000 Jews" in a little blurb on page 5. The front page that same day contained a long piece on the July 4 traffic.

Holocaust scholar Michael Berenbaum said the disgrace was that the media reported that "A million Jews have been killed," when they should have shouted - in 16-point type - "A MILLION JEWS HAVE BEEN KILLED!" They did not scream when they should have. We too do not protest or scream or get angry or threaten to turn off the spigot of financial contributions Jews make to (usually Democratic) politicians. We will occasionally have a very tepid demonstration, addressed by the same array of politicians and professional Jewish leaders with predictable speeches that send everyone home thinking something has been accomplished. How many Jewish leaders who meet with President Obama ask about Pollard? How many leaders who met with Prime Minister Netanyahu recently asked him if he requested Pollard's release?

We look back with disdain at the apathy of American Jews during the Holocaust. Granted, this is not the Holocaust - but have we really improved that much? I don't see how we are any better. Our excuses are more clever and articulate, and sound more reasonable - but our devotion to the preservation and well-being of every Jew still needs enhancement. We are often told our leaders have bigger fish to fry; but human beings are not fish. "I have called for my friends, and they have deceived me." Will that be Pollard's legacy, and Shalit's, and others?

According to our Sages, the Second Temple was derstroyed due to the baseless hatred prevalent among the Jewish people. And perhaps if we cannot find it in our hearts to protest every injustice against a Jew and to instinctively defend every Jew, we are presently unworthy of redemption.

There is a fine line between being so provincial and insular that we are indifferent to others - and being so cosmopolitan, so universal, that we are effectively indifferent to our own. In the not-too-distant past, Jews changed their names and noses in order to curry favor with our neighbors; now, they merely have to disconnect from other Jews and identify with the cosmopolitans, and some even with our enemies.

For too long, we have so feared being stigmatized as narrow-minded that we have become too judgmental and unforgiving towards our own people. But in reality, there is no stigma. Every group naturally takes care of its own before others - whether Americans or Russians, whether Muslims or blacks. That is natural. We have become unnatural, and many Jews are emotionally estranged from our own people.

We can - and should - condemn crime and criminals (and ostracize those who have intentionally harmed Jews), but that does not mean we also have to accept double standards and abandon our own when unjust punishment is meted out. We do not have to tolerate that Jewish prisoners of war never survive the experience, and are held incommunicado in gross violation of the rules of war. We do not have to tolerate the cruel and heartless treatment of them by our enemies (enemies that are otherwise celebrated by the civilized world) that is their now customary fate, and negotiate with them as if they are decent, respectable people.

We have to get angry, in a positive and constructive way. We have to take our inspiration from the Tea Party that is trying to transform the American political culture from the grassroots, because the elitists of both parties have not been responsive.

We need a Jewish Tea Party that can reflect the voice of the average, simple Jew who loves Jews and loves justice, and is ill-disposed to making the crass political calculations that sacrifice human beings on the altar of expediency.

Israel is not a powerless country. An Israel that even feigns anger for the sake of Jewish life - and demands to know the fate of Katz, Baumol, Feldman, Arad, Pollard, Shalit and others - can achieve surprising results. We need to bolster the sense of unconditional love that always emerges during crises, and join together to advocate for Pollard and Rubashkin, for Shalit and Arad, and not simply each sub-group for its own. Ahavat Yisrael is a difficult mitzvah, but it is a mitzvah nonetheless. Now is the time.

When we have self-respect, others will respect us. When we are fearless, others will fear us. When every day we pray for suffering Jews and envision ways to liberate them from their afflictions, when we hold our politicians and leaders accountable rather than sit silently as they take our money while acquiescing in the demeaning of Jewish life, when we show that Jewish blood is not cheap and Jewish life is precious, we will be a people worthy of redemption and the restoration of God's kingdom on earth.

 

Rabbi Steven Pruzansky is spiritual leader of Congregation Bnai Yeshurun of Teaneck, New Jersey, and author most recently of "Judges for Our Time: Contemporary Lessons from the Book of Shoftim" (Gefen, 2009). His writings and lectures can be found at Rabbipruzansky.com.

 
Rabbis Say Jews Who Commit Crimes Should Not Go To Prison

Jews Who Commit Crimes Should Not Go To Prison -

Rally for Eliyahu Ezagui, convicted of a mortgage fraud that scammed fellow Chabadniks, led by leading member of Sholom Rubashkin's legal defense fund. Donations to help Ezagui, said Rabbi Shea Hecht, are tax deductible. No anti-crime statements were made.

Rabbi Schwei, a judge on the Crown Heights beit din (Jewish religious court), noted that the (late) Rebbe was opposed to Jews serving prison time even if rightfully convicted of crimes. (The Crown Heights Beis din was implicated in witness tampering last year.)

Rabbis also condemned mesira – informing secular authorities like the police of crimes committed by other Jews.

A representative of Chabad's prison missionary arm, the Aleph Institute, also argued that prison is not a place where a Jew should be, even if convicted of a crime.

All speakers called money donated to Ezagui's legal defense fund pidyon shevuyim, redeeming captives. This is a special category of Jewish law that is more important than simple charity.

No one made an anti-crime statement or called for anti-crime education in Chaabd schools, and Ezagui – and Rubashkin, who was mentioned often – were not in any way reprimanded for the crimes they committed and were convicted of.

Contributions to convicted felon Ezagui's legal defense fund made to the Crown Heights Community Council – a Chabad-controlled, government funded agency – are tax deductible, Rabbi Shea Hecht said, as he urged Lubavitchers to donate at a gathering where it was very clear Lubavitchers believe they are above American law.

The best (and, I thought, least offensive) speech was given by Getzel Rubashkin, the oldest son of Sholom Rubashkin. Getzel focused primarily on the human cost to families when a parent goes to prison.

 

Watch the entire rally.

Download the entire video. (WARNING! This is a very large file, over 200 mgs.)

Courtosy of Failedmessiah.com